Showing posts with label whisteblower. Show all posts
Showing posts with label whisteblower. Show all posts

Saturday, 21 March 2009

Whiste Down The Wind

There are quite a few people like myself who felt that the war in Iraq was very questionable and, in particular, the reasons given and used by the Government to go to war were in some way 'sexed up', as the phrase of the time suggested, or exaggerated or downright made up.

Two inquires by Government sponsored Lords, Butler and Hutton, were given cleverly worded remits which never touched the heart of the matter and once again the feeble-minded public were left with the impression that 'You don't really want to know' or 'You are not capable of handling the real information, so leave it to us'. It was at a time when Alistair Campbell's powers were at their peak and Britain seemed to be trapped in some sinister Orwellian plot where propagandists had seized control of Government and we quite literally knew only what we were told.

This week, whistleblowers from the Diplomatic and Intelligence Community, who were previously threatened under the Official Secrets Act but never prosecuted, have come forward and demanded a further, more wide reaching inquiry.

I would imagine they have just two hopes to use the popular phrase - Bob Hope and no hope.

The Facts Emerge

Former diplomat, Carne Ross, still believes 'a lot of facts have still to come to light' and that it is 'disgraceful' that Ministers 'pretend' that the two previous enquiries told the full facts surrounding Britain's decision to join in what has now become a terrible and unwinnable war in Iraq. Ross quit the foreign office over what he saw as the inaccuracy of the information over Saddam's capabilities and weapons. Ross was for 4 years, Britain's expert on Iraq to the UN - so he just might know a thing or two about what he is talking about, or should we just believe the Government hype that he is just a stinking whistleblower and a nutter at that?

The problem is that he is not the only one.

Ross gave secret evidence to the Butler enquiry which has never been revealed - he also believes there are many yet to tell their story. His latest tirade comes after giving evidence to MPs and he has attacked 'a fundamental failure of transparency and accountability in government'.

Like we don't know that? We just let them get away with it.

It will be interesting to see how Gordon Brown will respond to the new onslaught by the whistleblowers without the protection of the smooth Blair rebuffs and having seen his predecessor draw his famous lines under the matter meaning 'shut up, there is to be no more debate'. I suppose he has more pressing matters to mind, like the fact his economic skills and credibility, of which he was so proud as Chancellor, have been cut to ribbons as Britain squirms in the worst economic crisis since The Great Depression.

For once it provides a convenient smokescreen under which he can legitimately run for cover and say the public aren't interested as we are all doomed.

More Whistleblowers

Just last month, Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, vetoed the publication of the cabinet minutes leading up to the invasion of Iraq 'in the interest of national security' that neat catch all phrase which euphemistically means that there is definitely something to hide. Two former cabinet ministers, Clare Short and the late Robin Cook, were dissident enough to sacrifice their careers over the matter at the time - no self respecting minister would normally trash their careers over a trivial matter like the truth. You need to be stupid like David Davies to do that or crooked like Peter, no Lord I think you'll find, Mandelson - those sort always rise again after serving time in the dunce's corner. But those who break with the rule of 'cabinet omerta' are pariahs for the rest of their careers.

A former colleague of David Kelly, the security expert who sadly 'took his own life with his blunt pen knife', Brian Jones became a whistleblower in 2004 and claimed intelligence chiefs ignored warnings from their own people that claims about Saddam's chemical and biological weapons were false. He was surprised at the time that MPs had not 'crucified' the security staff on publication of the reports and to this day only a small number of MPs ever saw through the guff that was written, even though much of the public report which was sponsored by Campbell was subsequently exposed as plagiarised off the web and a pack of lies.

More importantly, Jones was 'surprised' that MPs had not noticed the difference between the Prime Minister's foreword to the document and its contents - then again it was probably written by Campbell with some subliminal messages conjured up by Paul McKenna. I kid you not.

Katherine Gun worked at GCHQ as a translator and was famously sacked from her job before being told she would be prosecuted but the case was dropped. She had seen a memo from the US National Security Agency which asked for British help to spy on 6 countries who were 'dissidents' in the UN. It was later alleged that Kofi Annan himself was also monitored for the same reason. Somehow, again, the public ignored the obvious. Why would we spy on our friends if some sub-plot was not afoot?

Gun, as does Ross and Jones, claims there are many on the inside in the Intelligence and diplomatic communities who feel the same way but are too scared of ruining their own careers to come forward even though there is little likelihood they would ever be prosecuted. I suppose it is difficult to be prosecuted for leaking a downright lie.

Gun calls for a change in the training of spies who are told not to question what they are being told. She also claims there was a patronising view amongst her managers that said 'leave this to us'. If you go on to the MI6 website, which recently advertised for more Field Officers or 'lamplighters' in George Smiley speak, then you get an almost farcical qualification set out that very much mimics a Monty Python interview - but I guess they are just looking for the compliant types.

Whistles Down The Wind

It is difficult to know where to go from hear. The public may argue that three or so whistleblowers is hardly a quorum to start another enquiry. But then again, you are hardly likely in the murky world of secrets to get many who will break ranks by the very nature of the job. You don't go into being spook or diplomat believing every word you hear or see is true and that you should be guardians of the public conscience. The job of spooks is to play the game the way the 'Masters' deem it necessary. Like soldiers, they do not question orders or motives - they are professionals and just 'do their job'.

Today, the numbers of young soldiers dying in Iraq does not abate and the worthiness of the cause of 'democratising' the disparate nation has always been questionable. Middle East politics have always been full of side agendas and laden with greedy eyes on the black prize of oil. How Tony Blair can actually be chosen after his poodle-like sponsoring of the carnage in Iraq at Bush's bidding, says it all. Then again it took him long enough to interrupt his money making to actually pay a visit to Gaza under his role of Special Envoy. It must have been nice of him to pop by after all the violence had ended.

His first question must have been, 'what violence was that then?' as he was busy earning £240,000 for speaking in Barcelona to drunk telecoms executives at its height.

I don't think we will get to the truth of this subject until we are old and grey. When Blair, Brown, Straw, Campbell et al are well into their pleasant retirements, fat on their memoirs, after dinner speeches and Non Executive Directorships. Then again, we will be too old to care by then.

But what will our kids think of our inaction to stop the lies and blunders that has laid down a terrible, violent legacy for them?

There is no doubt that the actions of our Government and the inaction of us, the people, have made this world a far more unsafe place to live in for the future. But like climate change, carbon footprints, consumption of our natural resources and killing people in foreign countries for no reason, if it interrupts our lifestyle and our ability to play computer games extolling the virtues of stealing cars, watching violent TV programs or gun-toting young kids in the street shooting one another, watching binge drinking adults killing themselves slowly or watching the Government spend our future money with panicked abandon, we just don't want to know.

You can whistle down the wind, my friends. We all have our fingers in our ears and are singing 'la la la - I can't hear you'.

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Jobs You Will Never Get

Let's face it, if you are an experienced bank executive who is the sort of individual who does not like underhand dealings, aggressive sales tactics and misselling of products, you are hardly likely to end up as an official at the FSA.

In fact, slice and splice that statement to any industry and you will never work as a senior ranking person on its Watchdog. They don't want people like you. They want people who have multiple Non-Executive roles who cannot afford much time to do the serious business of regulation and who have served their time in Civil Service or Banks at the highest level, shaken the right hands and know how to make a bob or two.

Such people are deemed the ONLY people who are trustworthy enough to do such jobs. I would further contend, you would be hard pushed to find such jobs advertised anywhere in the sorts of periodicals, journals, job boards and newspapers you read and should you be lucky enough to see the advert, your application would hardly elicit a response.
You are not worthy.

The Worthy

Sir James Crosby, ex CEO of HBOS, who were subject to an investigation by KPMG after a senior manager whistleblew on their aggressive activities in growing their business, is worthy. It was under his tenure as CEO of the combined Halifax and Bank of Scotland merger, that such allegations were made. It was also alleged by the Whistleblower that he was dismissed from HBOS for 'losing the confidence' of the management, a euphemism for 'We don't want your sort around here, my son'. HBOS always contended the individual was made redundant due to restructuring.

This James Crosby is indeed the same ex CEO and regulator.

Soft Spot

Of course, this generous Government has a soft spot for HBOS. In its time of need, not a couple of years after Sir James stepped down as CEO and took up his equally lucrative role at the FSA and advised to the Treasury, the very same ministers oiled the cogs of a takeover of HBOS by Lloyds TSB. Well, they didn't just oil - they actually stepped in at the eleventh hour and the PM himself personally urged the merge of the two companies which would mean the new single entity would have no less than 28% of the UK mortgage market. It was troubled times indeed but a very curious decision.

Oh, and the oiling continued. For pretty soon afterwards, despite the fantastic due diligence, Lloyds TSB went cap in hand to the Government and asked for bail out cash. The result was not only did the Government aid and abet an uncompetitive takeover preferentially (I didn't see any other company offered money to take over HBOS) but the Government then got the taxpayer to foot the bill and we are all rewarded with some proxy shares in the new single company.

The Scent Of Corruption

This whole financial fiasco has more than a whiff of fraud and corruption. That a former CEO of a company investigated for its role in underhand dealings in the financial world can even be considered for a role at the FSA is bad enough, to have been given it is extraordinary. In fact, the argument would have been far stronger that the displaced Whistleblower was precisely the sort of individual who had the courage to see wrong doing and report it - a person of actions and courage of convictions. Clearly an individual not motivated by lucrative financial scams.

No, such a person is not worthy of such jobs probably as he would take it too seriously and actually find things which were not right, investigate them and possibly punish the companies involved. That is clearly not what the FSA is there for. It's why it is populated by former senior banking executives and part-timers who know how to tow the line.

Just like RBS larging it on bonuses with taxpayers' bail outs, this Government has no intention of changing the banking system or regulating it. It just wants its booming economy back and to do so it realises you have to reward the status quo. Only bankers can solve our problems, only bankers can regulate themselves.

Whisteblowers are not welcome.

Honour Preserved

But fear not - Sir James Crosby is an honourable man. With no fear of a scandal to be found, he has stepped down from the FSA knowing full well he has done nothing wrong, certainly nothing that can be pinned on his hand-made suit. He cannot be a Labour man as he would have just stuck his chin out and gone on even when the stench of alleged guilt was gagging. Not Sir James.

For him there are plenty of other Non-Executive jobs and Watchdogs to populate where his type of 'see no evil' skills are in much demand.